| Irwin Schiff |
|
DEFENSE FUNDS
Any contributions should be sent to Irwin Schiff at: The Freedom Foundation 444 East Sahara Ave. Las Vegas, Nevada, 89104. For further information please call 1 800 829 6666 Criminal Character of Judge Dawson Exposed Oct 13th 2005 Petition for Writ of Prohibition Petition for Emergency Stay of Proceeding Pending Appeal American Reconstruction Project-Host The Radio Rebel Saturday 6-8 pm PST
Amendment VIII FOR ADDITIONAL REPORTING ON IRWIN SCHIFF TRIAL SEE...
Trial Logs Blog Irwin Schiff has been filing "Zero Income Tax Returns" for the last 13 years and the Government has not charged him with tax evasion for any of those years. Perhaps if former Congressman Jim Trafficant, Leona Helmsley, and Pete Rose had filed "zero" returns, instead of the traditional returns they filed, they would not have been charged, convicted, or jailed for tax evasion either.
Archives
The Biggest Con
"The single most important book on the status of the nation that I have ever read," said Howard Ruff, editor of The Ruff Times. Soft cover, 359 pages. Purchase The Biggest Con here.
Blogroll
|
Thursday, May 15, 2003
Irwin Schiff RespondsAs noted above my question was what law makes me “liable” for Federal income taxes. Your letter states, “The obligation to pay the correct amount of tax …is mandatory as enacted by congress in the various public laws comprising the Internal Revenue Code.” So why didn’t you cite the law which was “enacted by congress” which crates “the obligation to pay” income taxes? The point is, I want to know what law makes me “liable” for income taxes and requires me “to pay” such a tax. This should no be too difficult for you to define, if such laws were “enacted by congress.” For example, in connection with the federal wagering tax, Code section 4401(c) says, “Each person who is engaged in the business of accepting wagers shall be liable for and shall pay he tax under this subchapter on all wagers placed by him.” Section 5703(a) and (b) states in connection with tobacco products, “The manufacturer ..of tobacco products shall be liable for the taxes imposed thereon by section 5701…(and)…Such taxes shall be paid on the basis of a return.” Therefore, please identify for me the statute “enacted by congress” that similarly states, “Those receiving income shall be liable for and shall pay an income tax,” or words to that effect. Also, there seems to be a conflict within your letter. How can there be a “mandatory …obligation to pay” income taxes ,” if, as you say, “the income tax system is one of voluntary compliance” ? How can the payment of a tax be “mandatory” and “voluntary” at the same time? Are the payments of the federal wagering and tobacco taxes also based on “voluntary compliance”? Therefore, I would appreciate your specific answers to these two questions. 1) What federal statutes specifically mandates the payment of income taxes, and 2) Are the federal wagering and tobacco taxes also based on “voluntary compliance”? If not, how can some taxes be based on “voluntary compliance” and others, not? Sincerely yours, Irwin Schiff Wednesday, May 14, 2003
Gene Chapman Asks Irwin Schiff To Respond To IRSGene Chapman requested today that Irwin Schiff, Larken Rose, and perhaps two or three others respond in writing to the first official response that Gene has received from the IRS.
|
Irwin's Web Site FOR ADDITIONAL REPORTING ON IRWIN SCHIFF TRIAL SEE...
Trial Logs Blog
Irwin Schiff
Irwin's Web Site
Links
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE For those who have listened to Irwin's audioblog of 9/21 @ 09:17 and are interested in the "two documents" that he mentions as being required by the Code but have not been produced by the government and are called for in his 12 page motion, you can find those two documents here. This is his 6 page reply, but it contains the info. 1)The Secretary is authorized: 26 USC 6201(a) which is supported by the definitions at 26 USC 7701(a)(11)and 26 USC 7701(a)(12) AND 2)Delegations of authority must be published: 44 USC 1505 (Chap 15). Since the government does not want the American public to discover the truth about how it illegally enforces the payment of income taxes (and how the public might protect itself) it persuaded U.S. District Court Judge, Lloyd D. George to enjoin me from selling “The Federal Mafia:How the Government Illegally Imposes and Unlawfully Collects Income Taxes" (and presumably other information as well). The following is the first page of Judge George’s 35 page Order. To fully appreciate the utter lawlessness of his Order, be sure to read the first paragraph of page 34 in which Judge George enjoins me from alleging some 6 specific “positions” in connection with income taxes. Then read the pleadings I filed in connection with my criminal and civil case involving these "positions," especially those pleadings involving the meaning of “income.” If you're worrying about income taxes you think you owe the government - stop worrying because legally you don't "owe" the government one dime, since there's no law requiring anyone to pay income tax. It doesn't matter if you earned millions in salaries, fees, commissions, gambling and lottery winnings etc., and additional millions in stock and other kinds of trading profits. For income tax purposes, you can legally report "zero" income and pay no income taxes regardless of how much you might have earned.
In 1986, 99.5 million Americans were tricked into filing and paying federal income taxes when legally; they didn't have to do either. If this statement shocks you, it is only because you and the rest of the nation have been thoroughly deceived by the federal government (with federal courts playing the key role), and an army of accountants, lawyers, and other tax preparers. All of these have a vested interest in keeping you ignorant concerning the real nature of federal income taxes.
|